Bearhug Defenses

Check out Jarret Waldman of Krav Maga Sherman Oaks demonstrating in the videos below:

Bearhug from Behind with Arms Caught:

Bearhug from Behind (Leverage on the Finger):

Share

Law of the Instrument

You’re probably familiar with Abraham Maslow’s maxim, “It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail.” It is actually a variation on a concept written by Abraham Kaplan two years earlier: “I call it the law of the instrument, and it may be formulated as follows: Give a small boy a hammer, and he will find that everything he encounters needs pounding.”

xkcd Golden Hammer

You’ve likely also heard “Never box a boxer, never wrestle a wrestler,” an adage attributed to various martial arts figures, depending on whom you ask. Each of these fighting styles becomes its practitioner’s Golden Hammer: a boxer and a wrestler will each rely on his or her respective skill set, no matter the situation. I’m generalizing, of course, but this is a fighting reality and is especially evident in many MMA events. A fighter who is dominant in one aspect of the fight game (boxing, kickboxing, wrestling, BJJ) will try to keep the fight in that mode at all costs, even when his or her corner is screaming otherwise.

Our system of Krav Maga is designed with this in mind, so our techniques are well-rounded and cover both stand-up and groundfighting. Standing and trading blows with a boxer or groundfighting with a wrestler is not an effective means of finishing the fight and going home safe. However, even within our versatile training, we are no less subject to the Law of the Instrument. Our Golden Hammer? Almost without exception, it’s knee strikes. Early on in our Krav Maga training, most of us discover that knees are devastating close-range weapons; true fight-finishers. Knees become the go-to combative, and most of us throw them regardless of how our partner is reacting.

Does that mean that we should ease up on the knees? No! Just don’t try to force their application in a scenario where a more suitable tool could be used. Try to keep these important points in mind:

  • Am I using my nearest weapon against the nearest target?
  • Am I using the most effective weapon against the most vulnerable target?
  • Am I unnecessarily leaving openings in my defenses in order to throw this type of combative?

If knee strikes fit those criteria, then keep these points in mind (see also Knees in Review):

  • Establish a secure control position with your elbow down, forearm against the neck, weight down, hips and legs back in a strong fighting stance.
  • See within the Fight. Your opponent might instinctively be covering his or her midsection, so instead of automatically launching a knee to the solar plexus, hunt for the nearest open target.
  • Once you’ve homed in on an open target, it’s tempting to rip off a half dozen knees to same place, but your opponent is going to wise to this pretty quickly. Think about alternating between high and low targets to create new openings.
  • It bears repeating: at every stage, be mindful of your hip and leg positioning! Don’t be a textbook takedown dummy!
Share

November 2010 Syllabus

The November 2010 syllabus is subject to change. This post will be updated throughout the month.

Questions? Post to the comments!

View the Syllabus »

Share

The Importance of Explosiveness

Ryu is explosive

We aim to be explosive in all of our movements, and there’s something about choke and grab defenses that lend them particularly well to demonstrating this. Since we’re in the choke and grab defense section of the Level 1 rotation, I will focus on those techniques. Know, however, that what follows can also be applied more generally.

It might be a forgone conclusion that bigger-stronger-faster is better, but there are some very legitimate reasons for why we should be explosive:

  • “Techniques must be accessible to the average person, not just athletes.” — principle of Krav Maga
    A choke is a show of power, a strength-based attack used by someone who is (or at least believes him- or herself to be) bigger and stronger than you. Thus, trying to pry some brute’s paws from around your larynx while your brain is rapidly losing oxygen is not an effective defense. Alternatively, our defense against a choke is predicated on turning our natural reaction to being grabbed around the neck into an explosive pluck at the immediate threat of the attack—the attacker’s thumbs. Among other reasons (including those below), this pluck must be explosive so that more force can be generated by a smaller person.

    Let’s use some simple math to prove this. Force is equal to mass multiplied by acceleration. So as not to get too geeked out, let’s disregard units of measure and just deal with hypothetical natural numbers.
    [Read more...]
Share

October 2010 Syllabus

The October 2010 syllabus is subject to change. This post will be updated throughout the month.

Questions? Post to the comments!

View the Syllabus »

Share

September 2010 Syllabus

The September 2010 syllabus is subject to change. This post will be updated throughout the month.

Questions? Post to the comments!

View the Syllabus »

Share

Hick’s Law and Krav Maga

Hick's LawHick’s Law is often either referenced directly or alluded to by many “reality-based” self-defense practitioners. It is one of the core principles at the foundation of Krav Maga and one of the main reasons why Krav is such an effective system. Hick’s Law, or the Hick–Hyman Law, “describes the time it takes for a person to make a decision as a result of the possible choices he or she has”.

If we simplify the formula at right, it looks more like this:

ReactionTime = MovementTime + ProcessingSpeed • log2(n)
ProcessingSpeed • log2(n) is the time taken to come to a decision and n is the number of choices

(If you’re interested in the math behind this, check out the Wikipedia page.)
Read more (There’s less math, I promise) »

Share

Some Reading

I suppose this post could also be called Augmenting Krav Maga Training, Part III: Mental Preparedness. It’s one thing to have your body trained to fight or flight, but what about your mind? When do we know we are in a bad situation? At what point do we act on instinct? How does our training in the school compare to the reality of self-defense on the street?

There are 2 books that, I believe, answer these questions and so many more. If you’re serious about self-defense, then you should read these.

The Gift of Fear and Other Survival Signals that Protect Us From Violence, by Gavin de Becker

The Gift of Fear could be considered a classic as far as self-defense literature goes. I’ve heard many people recommend this book, from Brian to social workers to domestic violence advocates to security officers to LEOs. Gavin de Beck owns a company that specializes in advising “clients on the assessment and management of situations that might escalate to violence, and develops systems and strategies for improving high-stakes predictions.” He knows what he is talking about.

The premise of de Becker’s book boils down to trusting one’s instinct. Too many people end up in violent situations by not listening to their own instinct and their own body’s natural reaction to a situation. They rationalize their fear away and end up assaulted or worse. We know when we are in the wrong situation. We know when something just doesn’t feel right. And yet, we dismiss those feelings because we simply can’t prove that something might be wrong, until it’s too late.

Making sure we listen to our own human instincts can save us from many violent situations. De Becker does a great job of giving real-life stories and how to use our natural reactions to get us out of bad situations.

Meditations on Violence: A Comparison of Martial Arts Training & Real World Violence by Rory Miller

Rory Miller’s book focuses on how training in traditional martial arts is very different from being in a fight. However, he doesn’t discount the training in martial arts; he simply points out some of the weakness in training and how to improve the training in order for it to apply to real conflict.

I’ve very much appreciated this book. Although Miller’s focus is on traditional martial arts (Krav is anything but), I do see many parallels in our Krav training. Although we attempt to be as realistic as possible in our Krav training, due to safety purposes, we lack some realism. Let’s face it—would you come back to class if you were punched in the face with a bare hand?? Miller makes a point that when training isn’t as realistic as possible, we are training flaws. And by training flaws, we train flawed techniques. Now, since we to have to remember safety in training, it’s important for instructors to point out the flaws in a drill or training exercise to the students. We need to explain those flaws and why we are training with the flaw.

In conclusion, although we certainly need to train our bodies to respond to an attack, we need to train our minds as well. Mentally, we must know where we are capable of going in terms of violence and defending ourselves. How do we know if a situation is going to turn from bad to worse? What is our best response? How do we avoid those situations in the first place?

I highly suggest picking up these 2 books (they should run you under $25) and reading them. Highlight them. Re-read them. You’ll not only learn about human behavior, but about yourself as well. In future posts I’ll explore some of the topics Miller and de Becker offer and how we should consider them in our training and in our lives.

Share

August 2010 Syllabus

The August 2010 syllabus is subject to change. This post will be updated throughout the month.

Questions? Post to the comments!

View the Syllabus »

Share

Counter-Skyjacking Seminar Video

Check out this video of a counter-skyjacking seminar from Krav Maga Worldwide Barcelona:

Share