
This week’s scenario will be…
Developing Your “When”:
Combatives for Preemptive Self-Defense
Check out this post for more details.
Saturday, 11/3, 8:30AM
Post requests for future scenarios to the comments below!
MacDonald Academy of Martial Arts
Kenpo Karate, Krav Maga, and Fitness for the Boston / Watertown area

This week’s scenario will be…
Developing Your “When”:
Combatives for Preemptive Self-Defense
Check out this post for more details.
Saturday, 11/3, 8:30AM
Post requests for future scenarios to the comments below!
“An overwhelming majority of violence comes with instructions on how to avoid it.”

Here is yet another excellent article from Marc MacYoung of No Nonsense Self-Defense:
Here’s a summary:
A related concept:
“The fastest way to figure out if you are in potential danger is to look for these three elements.”
Also read the counter to the Five Stages, the Pyramid of Personal Safety.
Marc and Dianna MacYoung seem much more rooted in reality than most every other self-proclaimed expert on violence. They are not alarmist reactionaries intent on making you feel like everyone in the world has the potential to rob and murder you. What I really like in particular about their writing is that any discussion of self-defense always returns to use of force considerations and the legal and psychological repercussions of resorting to violence.
There’s a very informative article by Victoria City Police Staff Sergeant Darren Laur titled “Ritualized Combat” that’s been reprinted in various places around the ‘net. It lists common physical attributes displayed by people along a spectrum of imminence of assault.
Assuming you cannot avoid a confrontation entirely, being able to read these precursors and developing your “when” are at the core of our self-defense training.
More good articles here.
I recently read these two essays and wanted to share because they relate so well to the principles of Krav Maga.
Krav Maga is not specifically mentioned, but the first essay most certainly draws from the same playbook.
The second essay is apropos of all the groundfighting we’ve been training these past few weeks.
I wrote about a few good books a while ago that focused on self-defense and reaction. Rory Miller, in his book Meditations on Violence, had a good suggestion that I’d like to present to our community. We train physically in self-defense and fighting and aggression, but what about our mental training? One key element in the mental preparation is knowing when. At what point to you decide to engage physically? At what point do you decide that the “Hey man, calm down” isn’t working, or giving someone your keys and wallet isn’t enough?
One thing to do now, when you are in a safe place and can think about it, is to make a list of what scenarios might happen in which you will fight or intervene. Now, I’m not talking about the mugger who just wants your cell phone and wallet and will walk away when he gets those. In those situations, hand over what they want and hope they walk away. But what happens if they don’t just walk away?
Here is my list:
Please feel free to add yours in the comments.
Here’s an interesting video from Rodney King of Crazy Monkey Defense that ties into the shirt grab question that came up at the end of Tuesday night’s class:
Overall, I think the Crazy Monkey Defense stuff compliments the “fighting” portion of Krav pretty nicely. I like a lot of the concepts that I’ve seen online and even experimented with incorporating pieces into the last sparring rotation. While taking the opponent’s back as Rodney does in the video is not necessarily something encouraged in Krav Maga, the opening certainly is. Some compliance-type techniques (i.e. joint locks and pressure points) from styles like Kenpo and Modern Arnis Jujitsu, while effective in certain circumstances, require much more time to train; rely on fine motor movements that can degrade under stress; and often require both your hands, leaving you more vulnerable to subsequent attacks. Striking, however, has a less steep learning curve because it is more instinctive; relies on gross motor movements that are less affected by stress; and, if you’re hands always return to your fighting stance, offers a better degree of protection against a flailing opponent. (Keep in mind, though, that use of force issues are more likely to arise with strikes.)
This video demonstrates three key Krav Maga concepts that apply to nearly every self-defense scenario:
| One concept that sets Krav Maga apart from most other self-defense systems is that we consistently train from a position of disadvantage. The belief is that all techniques must work whether we are prepared or not, as most situations requiring us to defend ourselves occur suddenly and with little warning. If we only trained from a prepared position (our fighting stance), we would either be delayed to action or—much worse—freeze when caught off guard. Part of our training involves practicing both offensive and defensive techniques from what we call passive or neutral position. Beyond developing lighting-fast reaction, not much forethought must go into defensive techniques; the decision to act has been made for us by the attacker. Launching a preemptive assault, however, is a very different situation. We must consider the how?, the when?, and the what then? (the immediate and longer-term consequences) of such an action. |
![]() |
Copyright © 2013 · Privacy Policy · SITEMAP
Site Development by Danelle & Patrick